Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 424%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 557%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 115%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics385% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive326% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory122.7 GB free of 128 GB
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230825
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 15 '23 at 11:05
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D-$598
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Memory 76
1-Core 206
2-Core 413
119% 232 Pts
4-Core 826
8-Core 1,604
144% 1,215 Pts
64-Core 3,658
226% 3,658 Pts
Poor: 113%
This bench: 115%
Great: 125%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,802
Palit(1569 F296) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 537.34
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
385% Outstanding
Lighting 619
Reflection 585
Parallax 732
504% 645 fps
MRender 534
Gravity 578
Splatting 278
361% 464 fps
Poor: 290%
This bench: 385%
Great: 402%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SHGP31-2000GM 2TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 31060C20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1735 2760 2787 2746 2757 2135 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
326% Outstanding
Read 2,832
Write 2,592
Mixed 1478
SusWrite 2,487
527% 2,347 MB/s
4K Read 10.7
4K Write 182
4K Mixed 11.6
127% 68.1 MB/s
DQ Read 958
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 45.5
168% 396 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 326%
Great: 446%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M323R4GA3DB0-CWMOD 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing below potential (91st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
205% Outstanding
MC Read 134
MC Write 46.2
MC Mixed 57.7
227% 79.3 GB/s
SC Read 46
SC Write 49.2
SC Mixed 47.3
136% 47.5 GB/s
Latency 88.4
45% 88.4 ns
Poor: 122%
This bench: 205%
Great: 205%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 43" 1280 720 COS4300 433UF10
Typical TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 483 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 413%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 419%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $2,469
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback