Today's hottest deals

MSI MAG Z790 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7D91)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 126%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics244% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
14 months ago, 14 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D91
MotherboardMSI MAG Z790 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7D91)  (all builds)
Memory22.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230418
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 16 '23 at 00:27
Run Duration283 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900K-$400
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 5.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Memory 76.5
1-Core 230
2-Core 467
130% 258 Pts
4-Core 934
8-Core 1,824
163% 1,378 Pts
64-Core 4,436
275% 4,436 Pts
Poor: 123%
This bench: 126%
Great: 135%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti-$761
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 537.34
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
244% Outstanding
Lighting 356
Reflection 346
Parallax 370
290% 358 fps
MRender 485
Gravity 302
Splatting 217
260% 335 fps
Poor: 208%
This bench: 244%
Great: 256%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$120
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,769
Write 3,414
Mixed 3,115
696% 3,099 MB/s
4K Read 83
4K Write 217
4K Mixed 120
394% 140 MB/s
DQ Read 1,678
DQ Write 1,429
DQ Mixed 1,576
1,175% 1,561 MB/s
Poor: 278% Great: 508%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$120
2TB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,596
Write 3,185
Mixed 2,958
654% 2,913 MB/s
4K Read 74.6
4K Write 215
4K Mixed 109
367% 133 MB/s
DQ Read 1,892
DQ Write 1,603
DQ Mixed 1,753
1,312% 1,749 MB/s
Poor: 278% Great: 508%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2017)-$65
445GB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 148
Write 60.2
Mixed 69.1
69% 92.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
96% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2017)-$65
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 170
Write 152
Mixed 73.7
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.8
132% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F5-8000J3848H162x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
151% Outstanding
MC Read 59.4
MC Write 59.2
MC Mixed 57.4
168% 58.7 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 50.2
SC Mixed 27.7
91% 32 GB/s
Latency 87.4
46% 87.4 ns
Poor: 151%
This bench: 151%
Great: 283%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 45: 0P 5R 6G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
45% 17% 76 217 59 144 27" 1280 720 GSM5B71 27GL650F
Typical MAG Z790 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7D91) Builds (Compare 6,581 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 442%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 123%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 528%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG Z790 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7D91)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $2,278
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback