Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 229%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 207%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 116%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics202% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive444% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
13 months ago, 13 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory27 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230825
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 24 '23 at 12:13
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X-$199
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Memory 86.5
1-Core 199
2-Core 404
120% 230 Pts
4-Core 784
8-Core 1,088
118% 936 Pts
64-Core 1,236
76% 1,236 Pts
Poor: 100%
This bench: 116%
Great: 120%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-$500
Nvidia(10DE 17FE) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3135 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
202% Outstanding
Lighting 290
Reflection 269
Parallax 289
236% 283 fps
MRender 365
Gravity 245
Splatting 193
210% 268 fps
Poor: 161%
This bench: 202%
Great: 204%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$113
512GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3236 3239 3272 2017 1138 1398 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
444% Outstanding
Read 2,935
Write 3,332
Mixed 3,129
SusWrite 2,383
665% 2,945 MB/s
4K Read 71.9
4K Write 226
4K Mixed 95.9
351% 131 MB/s
DQ Read 1735
DQ Write 1,543
DQ Mixed 1,658
1,238% 1,646 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 444%
Great: 477%
Lexar NM790 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 11296
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4244 4335 4335 4343 4311 4312 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
628% Outstanding
Read 4,426
Write 4,852
Mixed 3,384
SusWrite 4,313
957% 4,244 MB/s
4K Read 70.1
4K Write 257
4K Mixed 102
374% 143 MB/s
DQ Read 1872
DQ Write 1,392
DQ Mixed 1,510
1,162% 1,591 MB/s
Poor: 308%
This bench: 628%
Great: 605%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F5-5600J3036D162x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
193% Outstanding
MC Read 65.3
MC Write 75.3
MC Mixed 71.6
202% 70.7 GB/s
SC Read 58.3
SC Write 63.7
SC Mixed 60.3
174% 60.8 GB/s
Latency 65
62% 65 ns
Poor: 135%
This bench: 193%
Great: 193%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 144 27.9" 1280 720 ACR0907 XV282K KV
Typical TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 496 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 413%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 419%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $2,477
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback