Acer Swift SFE16-43

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics37.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive460% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Swift SFE16-43  (all builds)
MotherboardPHX Ray_PEU
Memory6.7 GB free of 16 GB
Display3200 x 2000 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230518
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateSep 28 '23 at 11:37
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Memory 63.5
1-Core 183
2-Core 364
104% 204 Pts
4-Core 668
8-Core 1,018
104% 843 Pts
64-Core 1,246
77% 1,246 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 780M
Acer(1025 1713) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.40.03.25
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
37.6% Below average
Lighting 43.1
Reflection 20.9
Parallax 65.1
35% 43 fps
MRender 27.9
Gravity 51.7
Splatting 67.9
42% 49.2 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 53%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS001TEJ9X125N 1TB
783GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51022A20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3250 3175 3208 2595 1378 1396 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
460% Outstanding
Read 4,057
Write 3,555
Mixed 2,564
SusWrite 2,500
710% 3,169 MB/s
4K Read 64.7
4K Write 185
4K Mixed 94.2
317% 115 MB/s
DQ Read 1,081
DQ Write 1,004
DQ Mixed 1,099
809% 1,061 MB/s
Poor: 289%
This bench: 460%
Great: 510%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown K3LKBKB0BM-MGCP 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB 23h clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 40.7
MC Write 34.1
MC Mixed 41.5
111% 38.8 GB/s
SC Read 35.8
SC Write 55
SC Mixed 45.2
130% 45.3 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 111%
Great: 130%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 16" 1280 720 SDC418D
Typical Swift SFE16-43 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

System: Acer Swift SFE16-43

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback