Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	11.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Supermicro X8DTG-D (all builds)
Motherboard	Supermicro X8DTG-D
Memory	19 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100903
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 29 '23 at 16:10
Run Duration	188 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	26%

PC Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon L5520 246 User benchmarks, average bench 57% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.25 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	53.8% Above average	Memory 78.1 1-Core 44.5 2-Core 87.8 46% 70.1 Pts	4-Core 161 8-Core 289 27% 225 Pts	64-Core 396 24% 396 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 67%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 52GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 32 16 11 17 25 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	11.8% Very poor	Read 109 Write 62.9 Mixed 28.1 SusWrite 22.1 12% 55.5 MB/s	4K Read 6 4K Write 7.2 4K Mixed 5.3 20% 6.17 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 11.8% Great: 100%
WD Blue 6TB (2015)-$215 8,416 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 3.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 34 34 34 29 29 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	41.7% Average	Read 113 Write 64.9 Mixed 51.7 SusWrite 31.4 48% 65.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1 183% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 41.7% Great: 97%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$113 42,465 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 34 34 34 29 29 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	29% Poor	Read 68.3 Write 58.6 Mixed 52 SusWrite 31.4 39% 52.6 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 3.9 4K Mixed 0.5 170% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 90%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$100 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 720GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 50 53 53 47 45 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	50.1% Above average	Read 125 Write 65.2 Mixed 48.6 SusWrite 49.5 53% 72 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 50.1% Great: 100%
WD WD81PURZ-85LWMY0 8TB 226 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 34 18 14 20 27 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	32.4% Below average	Read 87.7 Write 54.8 Mixed 50.6 SusWrite 24.3 40% 54.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 1.4 240% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 32.4% Great: 116%
WD WD161KFGX-68AFPN0 16TB 31 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 8.5TB free Firmware: 83.00A83 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 54 57 59 52 50 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	56.4% Above average	Read 140 Write 69.1 Mixed 63.5 SusWrite 54.3 60% 81.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 6.1 4K Mixed 1.8 371% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 121%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6x4GB 28,320 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 6 of 12 slots used 24GB DIMM 1333 MHz Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	29.3% Poor	MC Read 12.3 MC Write 10.1 MC Mixed 10.6 31% 11 GB/s	SC Read 6.7 SC Write 2.3 SC Mixed 3.5 12% 4.17 GB/s	Latency 118 34% 118 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 29.3% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	12	8	64	0"	1280 720

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370

Supermicro X8DTG-D

Performance Results

PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)