Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

Performance Results


Gaming 42% Speed boat	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 47% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	46.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	206% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus TUF X299 MARK 1 (all builds)
Memory	24.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171114
Uptime	13.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 26 '17 at 19:05
Run Duration	214 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-7900X-$413 19,432 User benchmarks, average bench 82% LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	75.1% Very good	Memory 72.6 1-Core 76.7 2-Core 196 64% 115 Pts	4-Core 415 8-Core 879 76% 647 Pts	64-Core 1,702 105% 1,702 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 75.1% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500 167,107 User benchmarks, average bench 59% EVGA(3842 1982) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	46.9% Average	Lighting 57.1 Reflection 62.9 Parallax 55 47% 58.4 fps	MRender 63 Gravity 57.2 Splatting 55 48% 58.4 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 66%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 264GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	206% Outstanding	Read 1,798 Write 1,324 Mixed 1,198 319% 1,440 MB/s	4K Read 50.1 4K Write 137 4K Mixed 22.3 177% 69.9 MB/s	DQ Read 39.4 DQ Write 70.6 DQ Mixed 146 85% 85.2 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 206% Great: 254%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2.5TB free Firmware: CC94 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 118 99 190982832 (03) Spinup time 94 83 0 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5725 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 67 60 25804995272 (09) Power-on hours count 82 82 15862 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 780 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 65545 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 38 128093659398175 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 241 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 1 1 266413 (C2) HDA temperature 31 62 25769803807 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 34 12 190982832 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 48266842477966 (F1) Unknown 100 253 2654383964 (F2) Unknown 100 253 2803104347	77.1% Very good	Read 139 Write 130 Mixed 124 98% 131 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.06 4K Mixed 0.19 80% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 77.1% Great: 113%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2.5TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 177 171 8150 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2154 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 3456 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 584 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 82 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 5112 (C2) HDA temperature 120 107 32 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	76.6% Very good	Read 179 Write 88.4 Mixed 119 96% 129 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 2.18 4K Mixed 0.24 89% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 76.6% Great: 100%
Hitachi HDS723015BLA642 1.5TB 3,312 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 988GB free Firmware: MN5OA580 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 132 132 95 (03) Spinup time 133 133 34387394999 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 15301 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 133 133 27 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 11667 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1943 (C0) Power-off retract count 88 88 15313 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 88 88 15313 (C2) HDA temperature 230 230 210453856282 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	39% Below average	Read 70 Write 65.7 Mixed 63.4 50% 66.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.29 4K Mixed 0.43 93% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 39% Great: 79%
Drobo 5C 70.5TB 404 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 58TB free, PID 3443 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	25.4% Poor	Read 32.4 Write 40 Mixed 39.6 50% 37.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.71 4K Write 3.75 4K Mixed 1.02 169% 2.16 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 25.4% Great: 89%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMR32GX4M4C3600C18 4x8GB 1,121 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	75.8% Very good	MC Read 24.3 MC Write 42.4 MC Mixed 23.6 86% 30.1 GB/s	SC Read 4.9 SC Write 18.6 SC Mixed 7.3 29% 10.3 GB/s	Latency 95.4 42% 95.4 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 75.8% Great: 134%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF X299 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 695 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 103%

UFO

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 104%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

CPU
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	179x
Core i7-7800XIntel $201Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	133x
Core i9-7900XIntel $413Bench 82%, 19,432 samples	121x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	81x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	68x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	39x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	37x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	30x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	26x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	40x
Dominator DDR4 2800 C16 8x4GBCorsairBench 113%, 223 samples	19x
F4 DDR4 4000 C15 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 115%, 708 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $1,131

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16