HP 500-242ea

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics4.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (83%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 500-242ea  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2AE0
Memory2.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131003
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 28 '17 at 17:45
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 83%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5500 APU-$135
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
28% Poor
Memory 37.3
1-Core 41.1
2-Core 64.9
29% 47.8 Pts
4-Core 104
8-Core 140
15% 122 Pts
64-Core 138
9% 138 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 28%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 235
MSI(1462 B499) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
4.09% Terrible
Lighting 4.93
Reflection 6.69
Parallax 4.62
4% 5.42 fps
MRender 3.48
Gravity 4.13
Splatting 7
4% 4.87 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.09%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$24
613GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP34 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Read 151
Write 161
Mixed 120
108% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 1.26
4K Mixed 0.27
74% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G6K1 Kingston HP698650-154-KEF 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
20.6% Poor
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 4.8
MC Mixed 7.4
22% 7.57 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 5.6
13% 4.53 GB/s
Latency 215
19% 215 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 500-242ea Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP 500-242ea

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $207
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback