HP EliteBook 865 16 inch G10 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics19.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive185% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
8 months ago, 8 months ago.
SystemHP EliteBook 865 16 inch G10 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8B6E
Memory52.7 GB free of 64 GB
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230705
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 23 '23 at 00:26
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7540U
FP8, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Memory 70.2
1-Core 174
2-Core 333
101% 193 Pts
4-Core 571
8-Core 806
86% 688 Pts
64-Core 934
58% 934 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 780M
HP(103C 8B6E) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.9.2
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
19.3% Very poor
Lighting 19.6
Reflection 21.8
Parallax 34.8
16% 25.4 fps
MRender 17
Gravity 24.4
Splatting 46.6
26% 29.3 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 53%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 2TB-$155
997GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QJXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1298 1179 1252 2010 2024 2051 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
185% Outstanding
Read 730
Write 1,079
Mixed 705
SusWrite 1,636
236% 1,037 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 58.6
4K Mixed 34.1
104% 37.2 MB/s
DQ Read 745
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 708
479% 594 MB/s
Poor: 286%
This bench: 185%
Great: 587%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF556S40-32 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
159% Outstanding
MC Read 53.2
MC Write 66.1
MC Mixed 57.1
168% 58.8 GB/s
SC Read 44.8
SC Write 59.8
SC Mixed 45.2
143% 49.9 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 108%
This bench: 159%
Great: 182%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 16" 1280 720 BOE0A4F
Typical EliteBook 865 16 inch G10 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: HP EliteBook 865 16 inch G10 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback