Today's hottest deals

Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A17 FA706IHR_FA706IHR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics43.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive144% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming A17 FA706IHR_FA706IHR  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FA706IHR
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221228
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 03 '23 at 15:24
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Memory 80.5
1-Core 133
2-Core 261
87% 158 Pts
4-Core 477
8-Core 797
78% 637 Pts
64-Core 1,035
64% 1,035 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Asus(1043 138C) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.14
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
43.5% Average
Lighting 54.8
Reflection 53.4
Parallax 49.9
45% 52.7 fps
MRender 62.8
Gravity 48.6
Splatting 43.1
41% 51.5 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 45%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ512HBLU-00B00 512GB
307GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1055 624 147 162 141 142 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
144% Outstanding
Read 1,150
Write 1,056
Mixed 1,019
SusWrite 379
202% 901 MB/s
4K Read 38.8
4K Write 70.1
4K Mixed 47.8
157% 52.2 MB/s
DQ Read 862
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 684
480% 620 MB/s
Poor: 104%
This bench: 144%
Great: 236%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFRA32A.C8FT 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
100% Outstanding
MC Read 40.4
MC Write 38.5
MC Mixed 35.2
109% 38 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 30.1
SC Mixed 19.5
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 78.2
51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 100%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 4: 0P 0R 0G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
4% 18% 22 33 12 144 17.3" 1280 720 BOE0A11
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A17 FA706IHR_FA706IHR Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A17 FA706IHR_FA706IHR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback