Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	158% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon Silver 4310 25 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPU1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Relative performance (0^th percentile)	36.8% Below average	Memory 21.2 1-Core 70.7 2-Core 150 40% 80.5 Pts	4-Core 280 8-Core 494 47% 387 Pts	64-Core 1,132 70% 1,132 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 36.8% Great: 78%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Fanxiang S500PRO 512GB 626 User benchmarks, average bench 233% 460GB free (System drive) Firmware: SN08878 SusWrite @10s intervals: 838 833 814 838 889 880 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	158% Outstanding	Read 1,024 Write 1286 Mixed 1,022 SusWrite 848 236% 1,045 MB/s	4K Read 32.7 4K Write 82.4 4K Mixed 44.6 150% 53.2 MB/s	DQ Read 515 DQ Write 312 DQ Mixed 404 303% 410 MB/s
Poor: 134% ↑ This bench: 158% Great: 302%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 9ASF1G72PZ-3G2R1 1x8GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 1 of 16 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	24.8% Poor	MC Read 6.9 MC Write 13.2 MC Mixed 8.8 28% 9.63 GB/s	SC Read 3.9 SC Write 6.1 SC Mixed 3.3 13% 4.43 GB/s	Latency 299 13% 299 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 24.8% Great: 34%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	27	20	60	0"	1280 720

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 59%

Gunboat

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 83%

Aircraft carrier

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon Silver 43101stBench 60%, 25 samples	5x
CPU: Intel Xeon Silver 43141stBench 66%, 19 samples	4x
CPU: Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C1stBench 75%, 3 samples	2x

GPU
Quadro RTX 4000NvidiaBench 98%, 9,173 samples	2x
RTX 3090-TiNvidiaBench 232%, 16,406 samples	2x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	2x

SSD
SHGS31-1000GS-2 1TBBench 98%, 11,576 samples	2x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $110Bench 385%, 327,441 samples	2x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $130Bench 336%, 200,600 samples	2x

RAM
M393A4G43AB3-CWE 1x31GBSamsungBench 42%, 4 samples	3x
9ASF2G72PZ-3G2F1 4x16GBMicronBench 75%, 2 samples	2x
M393A4K40BB0-CPB 16x31.9GBSamsungBench 118%, 16 samples	2x