Today's hottest deals

Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1704VA_A1704VA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics18% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1704VA_A1704VA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X1704VA
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230227
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 08 '23 at 16:09
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1355U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Memory 65.6
1-Core 183
2-Core 343
102% 197 Pts
4-Core 534
8-Core 839
85% 687 Pts
64-Core 1,008
62% 1,008 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Asus(1043 17C3) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4255
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
18% Very poor
Lighting 21.4
Reflection 24.9
Parallax 26.6
17% 24.3 fps
MRender 21.2
Gravity 29.9
Splatting 19.7
19% 23.6 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 18%
Great: 19%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SOLIDIGM SSDPFKNU512GZ 512GB
416GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1204
Write 1,294
Mixed 1,008
261% 1,169 MB/s
4K Read 56.5
4K Write 151
4K Mixed 77.5
265% 94.9 MB/s
DQ Read 444
DQ Write 384
DQ Mixed 536
369% 455 MB/s
Poor: 105% Great: 254%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2F1 Hynix HMAG68EXNSA051N 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
92% Outstanding
MC Read 37.1
MC Write 31.9
MC Mixed 32.3
96% 33.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 37.6
SC Mixed 24.8
77% 27.1 GB/s
Latency 98.5
41% 98.5 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 92%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 17.3" 1280 720 BOE084E
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $136
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $72
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback