HP Z240 Tower Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics11.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive130% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (70%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Z240 Tower Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 802F
Memory16.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200609
Uptime8.1 Days
Run DateNov 10 '23 at 07:24
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 70%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
71% Very good
Memory 87.7
1-Core 97.9
2-Core 178
72% 121 Pts
4-Core 297
8-Core 409
45% 353 Pts
64-Core 406
25% 406 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 71%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4000
Nvidia(10DE 097C) 3GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1404 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 462.96
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Lighting 12.7
Reflection 17.1
Parallax 17
10% 15.6 fps
MRender 21.1
Gravity 18
Splatting 15.6
15% 18.2 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
VO1200KEFJC 1TB
605GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4IFDHPK3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 991 925 819 904 952 972 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Read 477
Write 769
Mixed 392
SusWrite 927
146% 642 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 68.6
4K Mixed 25.6
97% 37.5 MB/s
DQ Read 666
DQ Write 466
DQ Mixed 552
416% 561 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 130%
Great: 239%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 8TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 180 174 175 178 176 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
Read 150
Write 163
Mixed 86.9
SusWrite 176
106% 144 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1.8
315% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$24
348GB free
Firmware: AP14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 134 132 135 139 139 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
68.6% Good
Read 104
Write 60.7
Mixed 52.3
SusWrite 135
64% 88.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A2K43DB1-CTD 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70% Good
MC Read 24.8
MC Write 26.6
MC Mixed 23
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 27.1
SC Mixed 21.5
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 74.7
54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 70%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 60 31.5" 2560 1377 HKC3122 SG32QC
Typical Z240 Tower Workstation Builds (Compare 3,256 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z240 Tower Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $170
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback