Today's hottest deals

Asus Pro WS W680-ACE IPMI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 123%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics156% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus Pro WS W680-ACE IPMI  (all builds)
Memory118.6 GB free of 128 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221115
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 13 '23 at 00:00
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900KS-$529
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Memory 78
1-Core 235
2-Core 458
131% 257 Pts
4-Core 901
8-Core 1,544
148% 1,223 Pts
64-Core 3,111
193% 3,111 Pts
Poor: 123%
This bench: 123%
Great: 138%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 770
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4575
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
9.52% Terrible
Lighting 10.8
Reflection 16.5
Parallax 12.4
9% 13.2 fps
MRender 14.9
Gravity 13.8
Splatting 11.9
11% 13.5 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.52%
Great: 10%
Nvidia RTX A4500
Nvidia(10DE 163C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 20GB, Driver: 472.47
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
156% Outstanding
Lighting 212
Reflection 208
Parallax 224
173% 215 fps
MRender 266
Gravity 176
Splatting 169
162% 203 fps
Poor: 133%
This bench: 156%
Great: 155%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPE21D960GA 960GB
715GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E2010480
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,291
Write 2,057
Mixed 2,166
485% 2,171 MB/s
4K Read 268
4K Write 249
4K Mixed 264
876% 260 MB/s
DQ Read 1760
DQ Write 1,359
DQ Mixed 1503
1,140% 1,541 MB/s
Poor: 304% Great: 597%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965794-016.A00G 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
154% Outstanding
MC Read 60.5
MC Write 60.5
MC Mixed 58.5
171% 59.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.2
SC Write 50.9
SC Mixed 29.4
95% 33.2 GB/s
Latency 80.1
50% 80.1 ns
Poor: 115%
This bench: 154%
Great: 154%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 26.9" 1280 720 HPN3715 HP M27fq QHD
Typical Pro WS W680-ACE IPMI Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 451%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 120%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 595%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus Pro WS W680-ACE IPMI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $2,218
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback