Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop TP3402VA_TP3402VA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics12.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive121% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop TP3402VA_TP3402VA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK TP3402VA
Memory8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920x1200x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230313
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateNov 13 '23 at 22:10
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13500H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Memory 57.4
1-Core 90.2
2-Core 171
59% 106 Pts
4-Core 294
8-Core 523
49% 408 Pts
64-Core 855
53% 855 Pts
Poor: 96%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Asus(1043 1843) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4255
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Lighting 15.2
Reflection 18
Parallax 16.4
12% 16.5 fps
MRender 15.5
Gravity 21
Splatting 11.9
13% 16.1 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 23%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVL4512HBLU-00BTW 512GB
346GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HXC70W1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 766 783 777 916 895 781 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 727
Write 707
Mixed 811
SusWrite 820
173% 766 MB/s
4K Read 16
4K Write 53.6
4K Mixed 25.8
86% 31.8 MB/s
DQ Read 456
DQ Write 218
DQ Mixed 404
282% 360 MB/s
Poor: 121%
This bench: 121%
Great: 339%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
79.8% Very good
MC Read 35.6
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 30
88% 30.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 22.8
SC Mixed 18.8
51% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 144
28% 144 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 3 86 54 60 14" 1280 720 CMN1441
Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop TP3402VA_TP3402VA Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop TP3402VA_TP3402VA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback