Dell Precision 7920 Tower

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 140%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics147% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive214% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemDell Precision 7920 Tower  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 028PX1
Memory82.7 GB free of 96 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230706
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 27 '23 at 16:24
Run Duration287 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 5118
CPU0, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Memory 76
1-Core 89.1
2-Core 177
66% 114 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 690
61% 519 Pts
64-Core 2,641
164% 2,641 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti-$385
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
147% Outstanding
Lighting 199
Reflection 193
Parallax 204
162% 199 fps
MRender 294
Gravity 170
Splatting 127
153% 197 fps
Poor: 126%
This bench: 147%
Great: 157%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
487GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4D1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1318 1202 1207 1205 1200 1202 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
214% Outstanding
Read 1,797
Write 1,506
Mixed 921
SusWrite 1,222
305% 1,362 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 60.3
4K Mixed 47
153% 49.2 MB/s
DQ Read 478
DQ Write 411
DQ Mixed 453
337% 448 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 214%
Great: 294%
WDC WD140EDGZ-11 14TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0A85
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 143 146 148 147 122 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
23.1% Poor
Read 124
Write 142
Mixed 117
SusWrite 141
30% 131 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 9.4
4K Mixed 2.3
33% 9.5 MB/s
DQ Read 5.9
DQ Write 9
DQ Mixed 5.2
5% 6.7 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 23.1%
Great: 25%
Nvme CT4000P3 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: R40A Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 393 396 394 396 393 391 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 1,746
Write 398
Mixed 644
SusWrite 394
174% 795 MB/s
4K Read 40.7
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 9.7
77% 18.6 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 116%
Great: 524%
WDC WD140EDGZ-11 14TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0A85
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 112 114 112 114 114 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
24.1% Poor
Read 176
Write 178
Mixed 109
SusWrite 113
32% 144 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 9.7
4K Mixed 1.9
36% 10.1 MB/s
DQ Read 8.3
DQ Write 7.2
DQ Mixed 5.5
5% 7 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 25%
WD WD80EMAZ-00WJTA0 8TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 117 114 110 113 113 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 106
Write 126
Mixed 96.2
SusWrite 114
82% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.2
295% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 105%
WD WD80EMAZ-00WJTA0 8TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 118 117 117 116 122 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
66% Good
Read 111
Write 121
Mixed 81.6
SusWrite 117
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.3
306% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 66%
Great: 105%
WD WD80EMAZ-00WJTA0 8TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 108 107 105 104 102 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Read 97.7
Write 110
Mixed 72.5
SusWrite 105
71% 96.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 1
273% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 105%
WD WD80EMAZ-00WJTA0 8TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 108 106 107 100 105 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 101
Write 123
Mixed 87.7
SusWrite 106
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.2
291% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A1G40DB0-CPB Hynix HMA81GR7AFR8N-VK M393A1G40DB0-CPB Hynix HMA81GR7AFR8N-VK M393A1G40DB0-CPB M393A1G40DB0-CPB M393A1G40DB0-CPB M393A1G40DB0-CPB Hynix HMA81GR7AFR8N-VK M393A1G40DB... 96GB
2133, 2666, 2133, 2666, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2666, 2133, 2133, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
81.6% Excellent
MC Read 35
MC Write 29.6
MC Mixed 35.3
95% 33.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 7.1
20% 6.93 GB/s
Latency 90.1
44% 90.1 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 178%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 65" 1280 720 ONK10C6 AV Receiver
Typical Precision 7920 Tower Builds (Compare 809 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: Dell Precision 7920 Tower

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback