Alienware m16 R1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 116%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics9.48% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAlienware m16 R1  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 0VH23J
Memory55.7 GB free of 64 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230814
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 28 '23 at 14:21
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Memory 80.4
1-Core 220
2-Core 426
125% 242 Pts
4-Core 811
8-Core 1,402
134% 1,106 Pts
64-Core 3,142
194% 3,142 Pts
Poor: 108%
This bench: 116%
Great: 120%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Dell(1028 0BFB) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4575
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
9.48% Terrible
Lighting 10.8
Reflection 16.5
Parallax 12.4
9% 13.2 fps
MRender 14.7
Gravity 13.8
Splatting 11.7
11% 13.4 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.48%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 2TB-$165
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QJXD7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,484
Write 3,028
Mixed 3,273
659% 2,928 MB/s
4K Read 68.4
4K Write 187
4K Mixed 104
336% 120 MB/s
DQ Read 1,808
DQ Write 1,385
DQ Mixed 1,563
1,178% 1,585 MB/s
Poor: 286% Great: 587%
Pm9a1 NVMe Samsung 1024GB
954GB free
Firmware: 36310229 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,181
Write 2,238
Mixed 2,085
485% 2168 MB/s
4K Read 52.3
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 74.4
260% 96.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1798
DQ Write 1,363
DQ Mixed 1,568
1,176% 1,576 MB/s
Poor: 154% Great: 441%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F5-5600S4040A32G 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
180% Outstanding
MC Read 74.2
MC Write 70.7
MC Mixed 68.6
203% 71.2 GB/s
SC Read 20.1
SC Write 47.4
SC Mixed 31.3
94% 32.9 GB/s
Latency 75.7
53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 93%
This bench: 180%
Great: 180%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 240 16" 1280 720 AUO3CA2
Typical m16 R1 Builds (Compare 722 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 153%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 184%
UFO

System: Alienware m16 R1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $251WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback