Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-AORUS 7 9KF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive154% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AORUS 7 9KF  (all builds)
Memory28.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230619
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 01 '23 at 15:59
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 65%

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12500H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
63.7% Good
Memory 61.3
1-Core 93.9
2-Core 195
64% 117 Pts
4-Core 355
8-Core 625
59% 490 Pts
64-Core 896
55% 896 Pts
Poor: 85%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10 512GB
444GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM15.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 947 1183 1192 1079 912 922 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
154% Outstanding
Read 931
Write 1,052
Mixed 822
SusWrite 1,039
217% 961 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 63.1
4K Mixed 34.4
114% 40.5 MB/s
DQ Read 584
DQ Write 223
DQ Mixed 489
339% 432 MB/s
Poor: 154%
This bench: 154%
Great: 376%
Lexar NM620 1TB
946GB free
Firmware: SN10660
SusWrite @10s intervals: 940 1100 1102 1018 871 882 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
146% Outstanding
Read 756
Write 784
Mixed 673
SusWrite 986
181% 799 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 54.6
4K Mixed 34.3
122% 40.3 MB/s
DQ Read 580
DQ Write 232
DQ Mixed 462
327% 425 MB/s
Poor: 170%
This bench: 146%
Great: 348%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Wilk Elektronik S.A. GR3200S464L22/16G 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
89.7% Excellent
MC Read 34.6
MC Write 35.7
MC Mixed 34.8
100% 35 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 21.2
SC Mixed 18.6
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 134
30% 134 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 5 64 0" 1280 720
Typical GA-AORUS 7 9KF Builds (Compare 72 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 108%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AORUS 7 9KF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback