Today's hottest deals

Acer Swift SF314-43

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics11.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive71.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Swift SF314-43  (all builds)
MotherboardLN Sake_CA
Memory0.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210728
Uptime15.1 Days
Run DateDec 03 '23 at 08:28
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 65%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
49.6% Average
Memory 40.8
1-Core 98
2-Core 173
56% 104 Pts
4-Core 314
8-Core 469
49% 391 Pts
64-Core 539
33% 539 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Acer(1025 1537) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.40.44
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Lighting 13.7
Reflection 12.4
Parallax 17.8
11% 14.6 fps
MRender 10.8
Gravity 12.8
Splatting 17.4
12% 13.7 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PDP3512B-AA1 512GB
243GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFK0S03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 213 219 217 216 218 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Read 657
Write 240
Mixed 279
SusWrite 215
77% 348 MB/s
4K Read 15.8
4K Write 29
4K Mixed 18.3
63% 21 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 201
DQ Mixed 252
199% 281 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 207%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown MT53E512M32D2NP-046 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB LPDDR4 clocked @ 4266 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
55.6% Above average
MC Read 22.9
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 20.8
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 12.3
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 180
22% 180 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 52 34 60 14" 1280 720 AUO683D
Typical Swift SF314-43 Builds (Compare 341 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Swift SF314-43

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback