HP 250 15.6 inch G9 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.32% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (80%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 250 15.6 inch G9 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8A1D
Memory8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230824
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 10 '23 at 18:37
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 80%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1235U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
53% Above average
Memory 53.6
1-Core 113
2-Core 203
66% 123 Pts
4-Core 293
8-Core 348
42% 320 Pts
64-Core 394
24% 394 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 53%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
HP(103C 8A1D) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
6.32% Terrible
Lighting 7.2
Reflection 10.1
Parallax 11
6% 9.43 fps
MRender 8.1
Gravity 10.4
Splatting 8.1
7% 8.87 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.32%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-512G-1006 512GB
425GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 456 454 503 437 519 521 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 1,000
Write 843
Mixed 690
SusWrite 482
169% 754 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Write 28.7
4K Mixed 40
92% 28.6 MB/s
DQ Read 392
DQ Write 148
DQ Mixed 259
195% 266 MB/s
Poor: 112%
This bench: 112%
Great: 413%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43EB1-CWE 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 16.2
46% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 11.5
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 184
22% 184 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 43%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 58 60 15.5" 1536 864 LGD06E8
Typical 250 15.6 inch G9 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 478 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: HP 250 15.6 inch G9 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback