Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 153%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 149%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics145% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive289% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory18.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230224
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateDec 14 '23 at 15:42
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X-$152
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 88.9
1-Core 170
2-Core 336
106% 199 Pts
4-Core 648
8-Core 1,127
107% 888 Pts
64-Core 1,407
87% 1,407 Pts
Poor: 85%
This bench: 105%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$400
Asus(1043 8858) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
145% Outstanding
Lighting 209
Reflection 209
Parallax 195
170% 204 fps
MRender 204
Gravity 151
Splatting 134
130% 163 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 145%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNV2S1000G 1TB
840GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBM02103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1728 1763 1796 1845 1844 1455 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
289% Outstanding
Read 1,970
Write 1,843
Mixed 1,457
SusWrite 1,738
394% 1,752 MB/s
4K Read 46.4
4K Write 164
4K Mixed 45.2
215% 85.2 MB/s
DQ Read 776
DQ Write 1,036
DQ Mixed 580
529% 797 MB/s
Poor: 150%
This bench: 289%
Great: 352%
WD Blue SA510 2.5 500GB
334GB free
Firmware: 52015100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 455 342 457 470 474 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 424
Write 455
Mixed 396
SusWrite 437
97% 428 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 98.2
4K Mixed 45
158% 58.4 MB/s
DQ Read 361
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 3.7
94% 225 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 108%
Great: 108%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$34
211GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 82 82 83 82 82 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
44.6% Average
Read 73.2
Write 81.9
Mixed 48.6
SusWrite 81.9
52% 71.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
MC Read 39.8
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 36.7
96% 33.5 GB/s
SC Read 31.4
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 39
90% 31.4 GB/s
Latency 68.2
59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 60 27" 1280 720 ACR02CA S271HL
Typical TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 1,273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $641
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback