Today's hottest deals

Asus Vivobook Go E1504FA_E1504FA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus Vivobook Go E1504FA_E1504FA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK E1504FA
Memory2.6 GB free of 8 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230324
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 19 '23 at 10:38
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 56%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7520U
FT6, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
49.7% Average
Memory 33.2
1-Core 109
2-Core 200
58% 114 Pts
4-Core 355
8-Core 532
55% 444 Pts
64-Core 518
32% 518 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Asus(1043 282D) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.42.02
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
3.29% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 10.7
Parallax 11.1
2% 8.07 fps
MRender 9.2
Gravity 6.9
Splatting 6
6% 7.37 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.29%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GB
425GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 479 473 456 515 510 522 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 579
Write 513
Mixed 483
SusWrite 492
116% 517 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 47.4
4K Mixed 41.9
129% 40.9 MB/s
DQ Read 444
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 388
267% 336 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 108%
Great: 290%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT62F1G32D4DR-031 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB 23h clocked @ 5500 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.7% Above average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 18.4
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 11.2
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 129
31% 129 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 41 15 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN15F5
Typical Vivobook Go E1504FA_E1504FA Builds (Compare 88 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus Vivobook Go E1504FA_E1504FA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $220Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback