Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop M1603QA_D1603QA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics16.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive292% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop M1603QA_D1603QA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M1603QA
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221121
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 21 '23 at 23:14
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
Memory 78.5
1-Core 156
2-Core 287
94% 174 Pts
4-Core 570
8-Core 807
86% 688 Pts
64-Core 995
62% 995 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 12AD) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.30.44.14
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Lighting 20.1
Reflection 17.7
Parallax 27.6
16% 21.8 fps
MRender 14.7
Gravity 21.3
Splatting 20.3
16% 18.8 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL4512HBLU-00BTW 512GB
401GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HXC70W1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1821 1839 1841 1891 708 223 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
292% Outstanding
Read 1,959
Write 1,872
Mixed 1,534
SusWrite 1,387
379% 1,688 MB/s
4K Read 59.2
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 77.8
261% 90.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,175
DQ Write 973
DQ Mixed 1,054
795% 1,067 MB/s
Poor: 125%
This bench: 292%
Great: 332%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2F1 LD4AS008G-3200ST 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
68.3% Good
MC Read 23.9
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 24.2
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 25.5
SC Write 26.2
SC Mixed 28.1
76% 26.6 GB/s
Latency 83.2
48% 83.2 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 16" 1536 897 CMN1618
Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop M1603QA_D1603QA Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop M1603QA_D1603QA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback