Acer Aspire A314-36P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.95% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive84.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire A314-36P  (all builds)
MotherboardADN Evelyne_ADN
Memory1.3 GB free of 8 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221222
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 25 '23 at 07:34
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-N305
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
48.3% Average
Memory 36.1
1-Core 77
2-Core 136
45% 82.9 Pts
4-Core 324
8-Core 509
51% 417 Pts
64-Core 570
35% 570 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 1655) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3417
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
6.95% Terrible
Lighting 8
Reflection 10.6
Parallax 8.5
6% 9.03 fps
MRender 10.4
Gravity 9.9
Splatting 8.6
8% 9.63 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.95%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PGP4128P-AA 128GB
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ELFKBO.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 496 276 255 238 198 133 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Read 677
Write 728
Mixed 372
SusWrite 266
114% 511 MB/s
4K Read 8.7
4K Write 46.1
4K Mixed 28
74% 27.6 MB/s
DQ Read 393
DQ Write 385
DQ Mixed 532
360% 436 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H9JCNNNCP3MLYR-N6E 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
62.2% Good
MC Read 23.3
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 24.5
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 11.8
SC Mixed 10.5
27% 9.53 GB/s
Latency 180
22% 180 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 36 15 0 13.9" 1280 720 AUO403D
Typical Aspire A314-36P Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A314-36P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback