Lenovo 21FVCTO1WW

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics21.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 21FVCTO1WW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 21FVCTO1WW
Memory55.1 GB free of 64 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231127
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 28 '23 at 16:30
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
99.6% Outstanding
Memory 76
1-Core 188
2-Core 365
109% 210 Pts
4-Core 659
8-Core 1,074
106% 867 Pts
64-Core 1,686
104% 1,686 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 115%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Legend(17AA 2316) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4887
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
21.3% Poor
Lighting 25.4
Reflection 30.8
Parallax 29.4
21% 28.5 fps
MRender 21.7
Gravity 38.6
Splatting 22.9
22% 27.7 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 23%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL41T0HBLB-00BLL 1TB
852GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CL2QHXC7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,992
Write 1,771
Mixed 1,764
411% 1,842 MB/s
4K Read 61
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 80.2
262% 89 MB/s
DQ Read 1,011
DQ Write 376
DQ Mixed 786
557% 724 MB/s
Poor: 125% Great: 335%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R4GA3BB0-CWMOL 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
179% Outstanding
MC Read 72.4
MC Write 71.2
MC Mixed 67.3
201% 70.3 GB/s
SC Read 22.2
SC Write 52.2
SC Mixed 34.7
104% 36.4 GB/s
Latency 85.4
47% 85.4 ns
Poor: 118%
This bench: 179%
Great: 179%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 165 16" 1280 720 LEN41B0
Typical 21FVCTO1WW Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: Lenovo 21FVCTO1WW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback