MSI MS-17LN

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics12.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive287% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star Bravo 17 D7VF
MotherboardMSI MS-17LN  (all builds)
Memory50.1 GB free of 64 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230921
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 22 '24 at 17:11
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
72.3% Very good
Memory 69.5
1-Core 97.7
2-Core 242
73% 136 Pts
4-Core 404
8-Core 584
62% 494 Pts
64-Core 691
43% 691 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
MSI(1462 13DE) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.40.01.54
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
12.1% Very poor
Lighting 13.5
Reflection 26.4
Parallax 22.6
11% 20.8 fps
MRender 19.3
Gravity 16
Splatting 17.1
14% 17.5 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT2000P3PSSD8 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR40D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1853 1880 1880 2415 2436 2442 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
287% Outstanding
Read 1,787
Write 2,452
Mixed 1,761
SusWrite 2,151
462% 2,038 MB/s
4K Read 45.6
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 46.7
198% 74.2 MB/s
DQ Read 937
DQ Write 179
DQ Mixed 309
291% 475 MB/s
Poor: 133%
This bench: 287%
Great: 517%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R4GA3BB0-CWMOL 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
118% Outstanding
MC Read 41.6
MC Write 49
MC Mixed 43.2
127% 44.6 GB/s
SC Read 21.2
SC Write 41.7
SC Mixed 28.9
87% 30.6 GB/s
Latency 93.9
43% 93.9 ns
Poor: 118%
This bench: 118%
Great: 179%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 45 21 60 17.3" 1280 720 AUO978F
Typical MS-17LN Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI MS-17LN

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $149Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback