HP Z640 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics66.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive131% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Z640 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 212A
Memory30.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210521
Uptime13.6 Days
Run DateJan 06 '24 at 22:31
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
69.6% Good
Memory 85.7
1-Core 100
2-Core 161
70% 116 Pts
4-Core 291
8-Core 407
44% 349 Pts
64-Core 423
26% 423 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P4000
Dell(1028 11A3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1708 MHz, MLim: 1901 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing below potential (54th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
66.6% Good
Lighting 76.9
Reflection 90.9
Parallax 84.6
63% 84.1 fps
MRender 87.6
Gravity 87.4
Splatting 94.8
74% 89.9 fps
Poor: 64%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 70%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
117GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXA73H0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 225 305 218 212 203 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
131% Outstanding
Read 1,491
Write 262
Mixed 314
SusWrite 236
124% 576 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 60.5
4K Mixed 37.1
123% 42.1 MB/s
DQ Read 578
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 438
322% 431 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 131%
Great: 331%
Samsung 870 QVO 8TB-$570
4TB free
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 340 365 379 388 395 394 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
78% Very good
Read 402
Write 398
Mixed 342
SusWrite 377
86% 380 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 35.8
4K Mixed 24.7
78% 26.2 MB/s
DQ Read 344
DQ Write 305
DQ Mixed 315
239% 321 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 78%
Great: 129%
Seagate ST4000NM0165 4TB
141GB free
Firmware: HPS0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 105 105 105 106 106 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
77.1% Very good
Read 162
Write 154
Mixed 106
SusWrite 105
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 0.8
251% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 121%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
1TB free
Firmware: CC52
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 117 119 117 121 122 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
68.2% Good
Read 118
Write 62.5
Mixed 78
SusWrite 119
70% 94.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
118% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 96%
Seagate Expansion HDD 16TB
6.5TB free
Firmware: 1801
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 107 108 97 106 107 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 144
Write 153
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 105
83% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.4
132% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2K40BB1-CRC 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
MC Read 25.1
MC Write 44.5
MC Mixed 30.2
95% 33.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 17.8
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 75.4
53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 38 15 60 24.1" 1280 720 DELA0B8 DELL U2415
Typical Z640 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: HP Z640 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 16% - Very poor Total price: $509
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback