Today's hottest deals

Apple MacBookAir9,1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemApple MacBookAir9,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-0CFF9C7C2B63DF8D
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 09 '24 at 14:34
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1000NG4
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
40.5% Average
Memory 60.2
1-Core 52.7
2-Core 98.4
43% 70.4 Pts
4-Core 121
8-Core 127
16% 124 Pts
64-Core 131
8% 131 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus Graphics
Apple(106B 020D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7870
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
3.64% Terrible
Lighting 4.3
Reflection 4
Parallax 4.9
4% 4.4 fps
MRender 4.7
Gravity 2.6
Splatting 6.4
4% 4.57 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.64%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple APPLE SSD AP0256 251GB
156GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 130
SusWrite @10s intervals: 478 349 354 343 386 393 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Read 301
Write 299
Mixed 507
SusWrite 384
85% 373 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 72.4
4K Mixed 24.6
100% 39 MB/s
DQ Read 435
DQ Write 210
DQ Mixed 299
228% 315 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H9HCNNNCRMALPR-NEE 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 3733 MHz
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
64.6% Good
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 30.5
MC Mixed 22.5
68% 23.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 24.8
SC Mixed 17.9
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 135
30% 135 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 51 23 60 13.3" 1280 720 APPA042 Color LCD
Typical MacBookAir9,1 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Apple MacBookAir9,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback