Today's hottest deals

Acer Predator PH16-71

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 119%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics150% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAcer Predator PH16-71  (all builds)
MotherboardRPL Discovery_RTX
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230907
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 14 '24 at 23:15
Run Duration80 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
119% Outstanding
Memory 80.4
1-Core 222
2-Core 436
126% 246 Pts
4-Core 844
8-Core 1,567
144% 1,205 Pts
64-Core 3,289
204% 3,289 Pts
Poor: 108%
This bench: 119%
Great: 120%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070 (Laptop)
Acer(1025 166C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3195 MHz, MLim: 4100 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.52
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
150% Outstanding
Lighting 211
Reflection 177
Parallax 197
172% 195 fps
MRender 268
Gravity 167
Splatting 119
143% 185 fps
Poor: 96%
This bench: 150%
Great: 154%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVL21T0HCLR-00B07 1TB
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXA7402Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 2,236
Write 2,630
Mixed 2,334
1,807% 2,400 MB/s
4K Read 65.8
4K Write 225
4K Mixed 95.3
17,505% 129 MB/s
DQ Read 1,717
DQ Write 1,333
DQ Mixed 1,301
12,595% 1,450 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMCG78AGBSA095N 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
93% Outstanding
MC Read 37.4
MC Write 34.6
MC Mixed 33.9
101% 35.3 GB/s
SC Read 21.9
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 22.9
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 78.5
51% 78.5 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 93%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 59 38 240 16" 1280 720 BOE0B17
Typical Predator PH16-71 Builds (Compare 496 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 212%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 256%
UFO

System: Acer Predator PH16-71

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback