Asus Zenbook 15 UM3504DA_UM3504DA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics28% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive190% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus Zenbook 15 UM3504DA_UM3504DA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK UM3504DA
Memory8.2 GB free of 16 GB
Display2880 x 1620 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231002
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '24 at 14:40
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7735U
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
42.6% Average
Memory 35.2
1-Core 78.7
2-Core 161
48% 91.5 Pts
4-Core 267
8-Core 530
47% 399 Pts
64-Core 854
53% 854 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Asus(1043 18D3) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.44
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28% Poor
Lighting 34
Reflection 43.5
Parallax 67.8
28% 48.4 fps
MRender 16
Gravity 43.7
Splatting 41
28% 33.6 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 28%
Great: 34%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00-1102 1TB
895GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 74114000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 928 891 1026 1228 1235 1246 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
190% Outstanding
Read 1660
Write 1,370
Mixed 1,381
SusWrite 1,092
309% 1,376 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 63
4K Mixed 40.8
139% 46.4 MB/s
DQ Read 481
DQ Write 134
DQ Mixed 370
256% 328 MB/s
Poor: 203%
This bench: 190%
Great: 508%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown H9JCNNNCP3MLYR-N6E 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB 23h clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
MC Read 32.1
MC Write 34.9
MC Mixed 31.7
94% 32.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 33.4
SC Mixed 23.6
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 227
18% 227 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 120 15.5" 1280 720 SDC4180
Typical Zenbook 15 UM3504DA_UM3504DA Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

System: Asus Zenbook 15 UM3504DA_UM3504DA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback