Today's hottest deals

FEVM FN60G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 112%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics80.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive463% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemFEVM FN60G  (all builds)
MotherboardFEVM FN60G
Memory27.7 GB free of 32 GB
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 28 '24 at 10:30
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13500-$200
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
112% Outstanding
Memory 80.7
1-Core 199
2-Core 396
117% 225 Pts
4-Core 762
8-Core 1,332
126% 1,047 Pts
64-Core 1,976
122% 1,976 Pts
Poor: 108%
This bench: 112%
Great: 116%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600M
AMD(1002 0E38) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.1.1
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
80.8% Excellent
Lighting 79
Reflection 126
Parallax 154
64% 119 fps
MRender 182
Gravity 83.4
Splatting 148
113% 138 fps
Poor: 44%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SKHynix_HFS512GEJ9X102N 512GB
418GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51730A10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3409 2649 747 758 766 768 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
463% Outstanding
Read 4,363
Write 3,268
Mixed 2,365
SusWrite 1516
640% 2,878 MB/s
4K Read 52.7
4K Write 286
4K Mixed 112
375% 150 MB/s
DQ Read 2,021
DQ Write 1,513
DQ Mixed 1,715
1,296% 1,750 MB/s
Poor: 190%
This bench: 463%
Great: 463%
Realtek RTL9210B-CG 512GB
93GB free
Firmware: 1.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 715 746 749 754 754 771 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 97% Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R2GA3BB0-CWMOD 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
151% Outstanding
MC Read 60.5
MC Write 58.4
MC Mixed 55.4
166% 58.1 GB/s
SC Read 22.3
SC Write 50.1
SC Mixed 30
98% 34.1 GB/s
Latency 79.2
50% 79.2 ns
Poor: 114%
This bench: 151%
Great: 177%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 54 60 31.5" 1280 720 GSM774F LG HDR 4K
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback