Asrockrack ROME2D16-2T

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 134%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics119% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive228% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory512GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 512GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrockrack ROME2D16-2T  (all builds)
Memory495.7 GB free of 512 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display5120 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221014
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 27 '24 at 12:43
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: AMD EPYC 7J13 64-Core
CPU1, 1 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 2.45 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
79.5% Very good
Memory 77
1-Core 115
2-Core 222
77% 138 Pts
4-Core 440
8-Core 873
78% 656 Pts
64-Core 3108
192% 3108 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-$293
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.42
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
119% Outstanding
Lighting 159
Reflection 111
Parallax 144
130% 138 fps
MRender 198
Gravity 126
Splatting 102
111% 142 fps
Poor: 115%
This bench: 119%
Great: 127%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$60
260GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 889 800 798 819 814 805 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
228% Outstanding
Read 2,316
Write 2,149
Mixed 1,694
SusWrite 821
390% 1,745 MB/s
4K Read 50.5
4K Write 88.8
4K Mixed 62.9
204% 67.4 MB/s
DQ Read 551
DQ Write 391
DQ Mixed 486
359% 476 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 228%
Great: 346%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A4K40DB3-CWE 16x31.9GB
16 of 16 slots used
511GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
368% Outstanding
MC Read 191
MC Write 121
MC Mixed 159
449% 157 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 36.8
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 86.3
46% 86.3 ns
Poor: 126%
This bench: 368%
Great: 368%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 6: 0P 0R 1G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
6% 15% 26 130 10 60 39.7" 1280 720 DEL4206 DELL U4021QW
Typical ROME2D16-2T Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 155%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 275%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrockrack ROME2D16-2T

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 131% - Outstanding Total price: $110
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback