Today's hottest deals

Samsung 960QGK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics28.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive332% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemSamsung 960QGK  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP960QGK-KG1US
Memory8.4 GB free of 16 GB
Display2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240313
Uptime2.5 Days
Run DateMar 31 '24 at 22:34
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 22 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 8.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
Memory 56.8
1-Core 183
2-Core 375
103% 205 Pts
4-Core 738
8-Core 1,024
111% 881 Pts
64-Core 1,401
87% 1,401 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Arc Graphics X8 (H-iGPU)
Sanyo(144D C892) 128MB
Driver: igd9trinity64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.5333
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.2% Poor
Lighting 29.2
Reflection 26.6
Parallax 59.6
24% 38.5 fps
MRender 29.2
Gravity 46.1
Splatting 54.6
37% 43.3 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 38%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDSN740-SDDPNQD-1T00-1004 1TB
863GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 73100004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1788 1568 1684 2088 1987 1995 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
332% Outstanding
Read 2,916
Write 2,293
Mixed 2,148
SusWrite 1,852
516% 2,302 MB/s
4K Read 59.8
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 65.9
237% 80.9 MB/s
DQ Read 955
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 696
502% 665 MB/s
Poor: 194%
This bench: 332%
Great: 526%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K3KL8L80CM-MGCT 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h clocked @ 7467 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
165% Outstanding
MC Read 69.6
MC Write 55.3
MC Mixed 73.7
189% 66.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 35.9
SC Mixed 29.6
81% 28.4 GB/s
Latency 142
28% 142 ns
Poor: 115%
This bench: 165%
Great: 165%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 4: 0P 0R 1G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
4% 4% 54 201 22 120 16" 1280 720 SDC4187
Typical 960QGK Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat

System: Samsung 960QGK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback