Gigabyte GA-B650 AORUS ELITE AX ICE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics7.64% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B650 AORUS ELITE AX ICE  (all builds)
Memory37.4 GB free of 48 GB
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 17 '24 at 03:45
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D-$320
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 89.7
1-Core 180
2-Core 352
110% 207 Pts
4-Core 619
8-Core 1062
102% 840 Pts
64-Core 1,386
86% 1,386 Pts
Poor: 102%
This bench: 103%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Ryzen 7000 (iGPU)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 24.10.00.35
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
7.64% Terrible
Lighting 7.1
Reflection 12.6
Parallax 12.3
6% 10.7 fps
MRender 13.4
Gravity 7.8
Splatting 18.2
11% 13.1 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.64%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 2TB-$139
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,657
Write 2938
Mixed 2,709
551% 2,434 MB/s
4K Read 56.9
4K Write 82.9
4K Mixed 67.3
216% 69 MB/s
DQ Read 1,483
DQ Write 650
DQ Mixed 1,128
820% 1,087 MB/s
Poor: 286% Great: 587%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DHX 6000 C30 2x24GB
2 of 4 slots used
48GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
212% Outstanding
MC Read 110
MC Write 62.6
MC Mixed 70.7
231% 81 GB/s
SC Read 52.9
SC Write 55.9
SC Mixed 54.6
156% 54.5 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 167%
This bench: 212%
Great: 212%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 5: 0P 1R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
5% 17% 6 186 57 60 84.6" 1280 720 SAM7002 SAMSUNG
Typical GA-B650 AORUS ELITE AX ICE Builds (Compare 44 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 218%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 222%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B650 AORUS ELITE AX ICE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 113% - Outstanding Total price: $979
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback