Samsung Galaxy Book 12

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.37% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive52.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 92% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemSamsung Galaxy Book 12  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG SM-W720NTKBXAR
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2160 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170501
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 13 '18 at 00:14
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%
CPU Throttled 92%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
61% Good
Memory 75.7
1-Core 97.2
2-Core 184
68% 119 Pts
4-Core 269
8-Core 267
36% 268 Pts
64-Core 254
16% 254 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 61%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Sanyo(144D C14F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 21.20.16.4590
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
6.37% Terrible
Lighting 6.87
Reflection 9.88
Parallax 6.25
6% 7.67 fps
MRender 7.1
Gravity 5.93
Splatting 14
8% 9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.37%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CV1-8B128 128GB
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T872003 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Read 474
Write 151
Mixed 175
58% 267 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 48.9
4K Mixed 12.6
70% 26.8 MB/s
DQ Read 27.1
DQ Write 149
DQ Mixed 36.6
43% 70.8 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 87%
Generic SL128 SD Card 128GB
119GB free
Firmware: 8.0
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
33.3% Below average
Read 84.9
Write 28.1
Mixed 41.3
38% 51.4 MB/s
4K Read 7.34
4K Write 2.93
4K Mixed 1.71
551% 4 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K3QF3F30BM-AGCF 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
56.8% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 17.3
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 18.1
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 88.9
45% 88.9 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Galaxy Book 12 Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung Galaxy Book 12

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback