Today's hottest deals

Asrock H570 Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 months ago, 5 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock H570 Phantom Gaming 4  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210222
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 30 '24 at 05:36
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400F-$94
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
66.6% Good
Memory 88.9
1-Core 59.3
2-Core 136
58% 94.6 Pts
4-Core 242
8-Core 345
37% 293 Pts
64-Core 392
24% 392 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6700-XT-$480
PowerColor(148C 2310) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 24.5.1
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
123% Outstanding
Lighting 138
Reflection 136
Parallax 288
112% 187 fps
MRender 232
Gravity 148
Splatting 205
160% 195 fps
Poor: 113%
This bench: 123%
Great: 129%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M8500G 500GB
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S5Z42105
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,559
Write 934
Mixed 658
231% 1,050 MB/s
4K Read 48.5
4K Write 43.9
4K Mixed 49.4
160% 47.3 MB/s
DQ Read 452
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 189
162% 249 MB/s
Poor: 118% Great: 277%
WD WD20EZAZ-00WGYX0 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 179 180 180 177 178 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 25% Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Silicon Power Computer & Communications 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
66.2% Good
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 23
66% 23.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 29.1
SC Mixed 16.7
58% 20.3 GB/s
Latency 69.6
57% 69.6 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 30: 0P 3R 3G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
30% 26% 47 210 57 144 27" 1280 720 WEH0000 WM27PX9019
Typical H570 Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 625 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock H570 Phantom Gaming 4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $428
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback