Today's hottest deals

Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZI4_FX507ZI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics13.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive182% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZI4_FX507ZI  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX507ZI4
Memory7.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240229
Uptime5.3 Days
Run DateJun 12 '24 at 01:41
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User ARE-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
80% Very good
Memory 62.4
1-Core 129
2-Core 264
80% 152 Pts
4-Core 522
8-Core 926
87% 724 Pts
64-Core 1,539
95% 1,539 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 80%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Asus(1043 275D) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Lighting 18.3
Reflection 25.9
Parallax 23.7
15% 22.6 fps
MRender 22.3
Gravity 26.9
Splatting 0.3
12% 16.5 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00-1002 1TB
232GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 74104000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 303 226 141 137 131 132 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
182% Outstanding
Read 2,253
Write 1,620
Mixed 1,402
SusWrite 178
302% 1,363 MB/s
4K Read 44.7
4K Write 95.7
4K Mixed 55
189% 65.1 MB/s
DQ Read 702
DQ Write 305
DQ Mixed 546
393% 518 MB/s
Poor: 182%
This bench: 182%
Great: 511%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
MC Read 36.5
MC Write 35.7
MC Mixed 34
101% 35.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 30.6
SC Mixed 19.7
61% 21.3 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 144 15.5" 1280 720 AUOD2A2 B156HAN15.H
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZI4_FX507ZI Builds (Compare 604 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 135%
UFO

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZI4_FX507ZI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback