Today's hottest deals

Dell Precision 7875 Tower

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 335%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 539%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics337% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive391% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemDell Precision 7875 Tower  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 00RP38
Memory110.8 GB free of 128 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240314
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 13 '24 at 21:04
Run Duration276 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX 24-Cores
SP6, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 68.1
1-Core 189
2-Core 377
108% 212 Pts
4-Core 742
8-Core 1,487
131% 1,115 Pts
64-Core 5,210
322% 5,210 Pts
Poor: 106%
This bench: 104%
Great: 115%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,802
Dell(1028 5107) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 555.99
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
337% Outstanding
Lighting 518
Reflection 543
Parallax 739
422% 600 fps
MRender 498
Gravity 539
Splatting 277
342% 438 fps
Poor: 290%
This bench: 337%
Great: 402%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Pm9a1 NVMe Samsung 2048GB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 36310129 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2830 2955 2993 2985 3003 2991 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
391% Outstanding
Read 2790
Write 3,095
Mixed 2,875
SusWrite 2,960
662% 2,930 MB/s
4K Read 61.9
4K Write 97.9
4K Mixed 77.3
245% 79 MB/s
DQ Read 586
DQ Write 412
DQ Mixed 901
564% 633 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 391%
Great: 471%
Pm9a1 NVMe Samsung 2048GB
2TB free
Firmware: 36310129 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1828 2576 2582 2629 2621 2641 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
335% Outstanding
Read 2,451
Write 2,633
Mixed 2,534
SusWrite 2,480
570% 2,524 MB/s
4K Read 54.1
4K Write 80.5
4K Mixed 65.5
208% 66.7 MB/s
DQ Read 346
DQ Write 568
DQ Mixed 688
456% 534 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 335%
Great: 471%
Kxg80znv2t04 NVMe KIOXIA 2048GB
218GB free
Firmware: 11304102 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2062 2062 2070 2071 2009 1920 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
315% Outstanding
Read 2,741
Write 3273
Mixed 2523
SusWrite 2,032
596% 2,642 MB/s
4K Read 50.1
4K Write 83.4
4K Mixed 59.1
196% 64.2 MB/s
DQ Read 364
DQ Write 542
DQ Mixed 624
424% 510 MB/s
Poor: 203%
This bench: 315%
Great: 493%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown MTC20F2085S1RC48BA1 4x31.8GB
4 of 8 slots used
127GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
387% Outstanding
MC Read 212
MC Write 116
MC Mixed 148
454% 159 GB/s
SC Read 43.4
SC Write 72.6
SC Mixed 54.8
163% 56.9 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 193%
This bench: 387%
Great: 387%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 2 144 27.2" 1280 720 GSM5BB7 LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical Precision 7875 Tower Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 385%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 112%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 510%
UFO

System: Dell Precision 7875 Tower

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $1,802
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback