Dell Precision 5820 Tower

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Precision 5820 Tower  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0X30MX
Memory54.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210727
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 14 '24 at 23:21
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W-2223
CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
67.1% Good
Memory 66.3
1-Core 89.2
2-Core 201
65% 119 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 609
59% 486 Pts
64-Core 580
36% 580 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100
Dell(1028 0B0C) 2GB
CLim: 1219 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.10.02
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Lighting 12.8
Reflection 22.4
Parallax 19.3
10% 18.2 fps
MRender 12.5
Gravity 15.2
Splatting 20.2
14% 16 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 12%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme PC711 SK hy 256GB
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1131 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,104
Write 1729
Mixed 908
349% 1,580 MB/s
4K Read 50.2
4K Write 155
4K Mixed 46.9
218% 84 MB/s
DQ Read 807
DQ Write 442
DQ Mixed 615
460% 621 MB/s
Poor: 114% Great: 310%
Samsung PSSD T7 1TB
662GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 290
Write 344
Mixed 309
71% 314 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 34.6
4K Mixed 26.5
84% 27.4 MB/s
DQ Read 159
DQ Write 169
DQ Mixed 178
130% 169 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18ASF4G72PDZ-3G2E1 2x31.5GB
2 of 8 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55% Above average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 17.4
59% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 9
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 55%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 100 34.1" 1280 720 GSM7795 LG ULTRAWIDE
Typical Precision 5820 Tower Builds (Compare 2,642 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat

System: Dell Precision 5820 Tower

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback