Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-16R6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive95.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star GF63 Thin 11UCX
MotherboardMSI MS-16R6  (all builds)
Memory6.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230629
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateJul 12 '24 at 11:49
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
73% Very good
Memory 67.2
1-Core 141
2-Core 262
84% 157 Pts
4-Core 423
8-Core 723
70% 573 Pts
64-Core 861
53% 861 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 73%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
MSI(1462 132E) 128MB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.5186
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
3.76% Terrible
Lighting 5.3
Reflection 10.2
Parallax 5.9
4% 7.13 fps
MRender 8.8
Gravity 0.1
Splatting 1.9
3% 3.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.76%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL4512HBLU 512GB
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HXC70W1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 174 103 16 28 84 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
Read 1,095
Write 394
Mixed 145
SusWrite 120
95% 439 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 149
4K Mixed 13.2
124% 60.4 MB/s
DQ Read 211
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 202
150% 199 MB/s
Poor: 95%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 347%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2R1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
89.5% Excellent
MC Read 36.2
MC Write 34.5
MC Mixed 29.9
96% 33.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 35.7
SC Mixed 18.4
67% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 144 15.5" 1536 793 AUOAF90
Typical MS-16R6 Builds (Compare 4,197 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16R6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $246Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback