Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 83AL

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics17.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive358% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 83AL  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory14.7 GB free of 32 GB
Display2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231212
Uptime10.1 Days
Run DateJul 19 '24 at 13:59
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13500H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Memory 65.3
1-Core 184
2-Core 372
106% 207 Pts
4-Core 640
8-Core 967
100% 803 Pts
64-Core 1,440
89% 1,440 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Legend(17AA 3803) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
17.9% Very poor
Lighting 21.7
Reflection 26.4
Parallax 25.4
18% 24.5 fps
MRender 22.2
Gravity 28.9
Splatting 18.1
18% 23.1 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 23%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SKHynix_HFS001TEJ4X112N 1TB
669GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51030C31
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2804 2956 3048 3034 2785 1552 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
358% Outstanding
Read 1,724
Write 2,931
Mixed 1,874
SusWrite 2,696
524% 2,306 MB/s
4K Read 57.9
4K Write 191
4K Mixed 42.4
243% 97.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,411
DQ Write 1,018
DQ Mixed 1,258
928% 1,229 MB/s
Poor: 140%
This bench: 358%
Great: 385%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H58G66AK6BX070 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
139% Outstanding
MC Read 52.4
MC Write 58.1
MC Mixed 52.6
155% 54.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 47
SC Mixed 26.2
84% 29.6 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 99%
This bench: 139%
Great: 150%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 51 20 60 23" 1920 1009 PHLC0C7 PHL 234E5
Typical 83AL Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Lenovo 83AL

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback