Today's hottest deals

HP Laptop 15-fc0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Laptop 15-fc0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8B2F
Memory2 GB free of 8 GB
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240407
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 25 '24 at 02:23
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7520U
FT6, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Memory 57.9
1-Core 90.9
2-Core 172
59% 107 Pts
4-Core 303
8-Core 455
47% 379 Pts
64-Core 458
28% 458 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
HP(103C 8B2F) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.20.48.07
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
4.89% Terrible
Lighting 2.8
Reflection 10.9
Parallax 11.6
2% 8.43 fps
MRender 9.1
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 18.1
10% 11.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.89%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-512G-2006 512GB
424GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 456 445 435 456 478 508 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 543
Write 497
Mixed 485
SusWrite 463
112% 497 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 40.8
4K Mixed 33.6
105% 33.6 MB/s
DQ Read 668
DQ Write 128
DQ Mixed 376
282% 391 MB/s
Poor: 101%
This bench: 101%
Great: 429%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K3LKBKB0BM-MGCP 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB 23h clocked @ 5500 MHz
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
53.8% Above average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 18.6
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 18.2
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 135
30% 135 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 7 141 51 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO5191
Typical Laptop 15-fc0xxx Builds (Compare 139 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15-fc0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback