Today's hottest deals

Asus ASUS Vivobook S 15 M5506WA_M5506WA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (99th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 1 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics46% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ASUS Vivobook S 15 M5506WA_M5506WA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M5506WA
Memory22 GB free of 32 GB
Display2880 x 1620 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240805
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 31 '24 at 10:50
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 365
FP8LPDDR5x, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
97.9% Outstanding
Memory 64.8
1-Core 208
2-Core 387
112% 220 Pts
4-Core 700
8-Core 1,291
119% 995 Pts
64-Core 1,759
109% 1,759 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 97.9%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 880M
Asus(1043 38B8) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 24.10.18.11
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
46% Average
Lighting 51.6
Reflection 38.1
Parallax 102
42% 64.1 fps
MRender 25.9
Gravity 72.3
Splatting 87
54% 61.7 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 46%
Great: 44%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDKBA1T0QFM-1BD1AABGB 1TB
749GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3MA101
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1395
Write 1,166
Mixed 1,061
268% 1,207 MB/s
4K Read 45.7
4K Write 27.4
4K Mixed 21.6
111% 31.6 MB/s
DQ Read 393
DQ Write 84.8
DQ Mixed 202
158% 227 MB/s
Poor: 147% Great: 323%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K3KL9L90CM-MGCT 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB 23h clocked @ 7500 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
199% Outstanding
MC Read 81
MC Write 73.8
MC Mixed 62.6
207% 72.5 GB/s
SC Read 46.8
SC Write 96.9
SC Mixed 64
198% 69.2 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 108%
This bench: 199%
Great: 187%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 52 60 15.5" 1280 720 SDC4180
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $70
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback