Today's hottest deals

Samsung M393B1K70CHD-CH9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics132% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive47.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemIntel Xeon E5-2697 v2
MotherboardSamsung M393B1K70CHD-CH9  (all builds)
Memory29.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 01 '24 at 00:52
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
60.3% Good
Memory 67.9
1-Core 70.8
2-Core 140
54% 92.7 Pts
4-Core 283
8-Core 564
50% 424 Pts
64-Core 909
56% 909 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GRID RTX6000-24Q
Nvidia(10DE 132C) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 10GB, Driver: 537.70
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
132% Outstanding
Lighting 171
Reflection 166
Parallax 188
139% 175 fps
MRender 216
Gravity 171
Splatting 141
140% 176 fps
Poor: 132%
This bench: 132%
Great: 159%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 1.5TB
303GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 295 298 298 282 278 284 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.2% Average
Read 315
Write 292
Mixed 322
SusWrite 289
69% 305 MB/s
4K Read 8.9
4K Write 10.7
4K Mixed 10.5
33% 10 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 142
DQ Mixed 155
115% 153 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung Specific 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM RAM clocked @ 1866 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
102% Outstanding
MC Read 50.7
MC Write 40.5
MC Mixed 37.2
122% 42.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 5.1
20% 6.97 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 240 21.7" 1920 1017 NVD0000
Typical M393B1K70CHD-CH9 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Samsung M393B1K70CHD-CH9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $147
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback