Today's hottest deals

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WI_GA605WI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics53% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WI_GA605WI  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GA605WI
Memory19.4 GB free of 32 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240801
Uptime3.4 Days
Run DateSep 06 '24 at 22:44
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 HX 370
FP8LPDDR5x, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Memory 48.9
1-Core 82.5
2-Core 162
53% 97.7 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 513
50% 412 Pts
64-Core 1,288
80% 1,288 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 890M
Asus(1043 1E83) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 24.10.18.08
Performing below potential (60th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53% Above average
Lighting 63.3
Reflection 29.2
Parallax 112
52% 68.2 fps
MRender 27.9
Gravity 82.7
Splatting 84.6
56% 65.1 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 53%
Great: 71%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL21T0HDLU-00BT7 1TB
772GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXD71W2Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,717
Write 1,233
Mixed 1,318
316% 1,423 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 39.9
4K Mixed 34.1
116% 35.8 MB/s
DQ Read 236
DQ Write 85.8
DQ Mixed 193
134% 171 MB/s
Poor: 318% Great: 425%
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 731100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,478
Write 1,008
Mixed 1,170
270% 1,219 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 40.5
4K Mixed 32.8
111% 35 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 84.8
DQ Mixed 196
132% 163 MB/s
Poor: 260% Great: 622%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K3KL9L90CM-MGCT 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB 23h clocked @ 7500 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
178% Outstanding
MC Read 74.8
MC Write 67.2
MC Mixed 64.1
196% 68.7 GB/s
SC Read 36.1
SC Write 47.6
SC Mixed 51.8
129% 45.2 GB/s
Latency 160
25% 160 ns
Poor: 110%
This bench: 178%
Great: 200%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 61 50 240 21.5" 1280 720 SDC41AE ATNA60DL04-0
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $139
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $72
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback