Today's hottest deals

Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV_FA401WV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics65.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV_FA401WV  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FA401WV
Memory8.8 GB free of 16 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240628
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 09 '24 at 17:31
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 HX 370
FP8LPDDR5x, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
63.5% Good
Memory 52.8
1-Core 116
2-Core 226
70% 132 Pts
4-Core 397
8-Core 678
65% 537 Pts
64-Core 1,714
106% 1,714 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 890M
Asus(1043 3798) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 24.10.18.05
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
65.3% Good
Lighting 78.5
Reflection 30.6
Parallax 130
64% 79.6 fps
MRender 26.8
Gravity 105
Splatting 104
68% 78.7 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 65%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00-1102 1TB
866GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 74114000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,368
Write 1,220
Mixed 1,298
289% 1,295 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 40.6
4K Mixed 29.8
98% 32 MB/s
DQ Read 595
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 370
277% 382 MB/s
Poor: 213% Great: 507%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K3KL8L80CM-MGCT 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB 23h clocked @ 7500 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
156% Outstanding
MC Read 62.7
MC Write 55.6
MC Mixed 52.4
163% 56.9 GB/s
SC Read 39
SC Write 67.1
SC Mixed 56.8
155% 54.3 GB/s
Latency 135
30% 135 ns
Poor: 90%
This bench: 156%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 165 14" 2048 1209 BOE0CA4 NE140QDM-NX7
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV_FA401WV Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A14 FA401WV_FA401WV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback