Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X670 GAMING X AX V2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 257%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 306%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 115%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics231% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive110% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X670 GAMING X AX V2  (all builds)
Memory25.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231214
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 01 '24 at 14:38
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D-$569
AM5, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 5.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Memory 76.5
1-Core 220
2-Core 406
121% 234 Pts
4-Core 814
8-Core 1,589
142% 1,201 Pts
64-Core 2,736
169% 2,736 Pts
Poor: 109%
This bench: 115%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-S (Super)-$569
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.65
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
231% Outstanding
Lighting 333
Reflection 323
Parallax 342
271% 333 fps
MRender 467
Gravity 272
Splatting 218
249% 319 fps
Poor: 182%
This bench: 231%
Great: 232%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
669GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 483 474 456 458 459 460 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 513
Write 486
Mixed 367
SusWrite 465
103% 458 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 92.2
4K Mixed 38.8
146% 54 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 356
DQ Mixed 293
241% 345 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 110%
Great: 133%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$116
689GB free
Firmware: 3B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2278 2289 1526 920 918 919 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
327% Outstanding
Read 2,322
Write 1,934
Mixed 2,245
SusWrite 1,475
448% 1,994 MB/s
4K Read 56.3
4K Write 96.2
4K Mixed 65.1
220% 72.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,897
DQ Write 1,540
DQ Mixed 1,720
1,288% 1,719 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 327%
Great: 410%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$116
415GB free
Firmware: 3B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2162 2273 2273 2270 2055 691 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
366% Outstanding
Read 2,474
Write 2,254
Mixed 2,256
SusWrite 1,954
503% 2,235 MB/s
4K Read 57.2
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 68.7
233% 78.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,890
DQ Write 1,509
DQ Mixed 1,698
1,271% 1,699 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 366%
Great: 410%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF560C30-16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
214% Outstanding
MC Read 127
MC Write 51.5
MC Mixed 69.9
237% 82.8 GB/s
SC Read 44.1
SC Write 57.2
SC Mixed 49.9
144% 50.4 GB/s
Latency 89.9
44% 89.9 ns
Poor: 144%
This bench: 214%
Great: 214%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 144 27" 1280 720 AOC2702 Q27G2WG4
Typical GA-X670 GAMING X AX V2 Builds (Compare 93 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 412%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 420%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X670 GAMING X AX V2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $2,500
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback