Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics33.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory29 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 18 '18 at 20:19
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Memory 91.1
1-Core 75.5
2-Core 152
65% 106 Pts
4-Core 287
8-Core 472
46% 380 Pts
64-Core 475
29% 475 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000
Nvidia(10DE 1153) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 390.65
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
33.6% Below average
Lighting 41.2
Reflection 40
Parallax 37.1
34% 39.4 fps
MRender 48.9
Gravity 36.4
Splatting 38.7
34% 41.3 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 1TB-$90
978GB free
Firmware: M0CR040 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
61.4% Good
Read 391
Write 317
Mixed 282
73% 330 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 27.1
4K Mixed 18.6
67% 21.6 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 107
DQ Mixed 53.9
61% 105 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 105%
Crucial MX300 1TB-$90
796GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR040 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
60.4% Good
Read 389
Write 313
Mixed 279
73% 327 MB/s
4K Read 18.6
4K Write 25.8
4K Mixed 18.1
65% 20.8 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 105
DQ Mixed 54
61% 104 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 105%
HPT DISK 0_0 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 4.00
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 36% Great: 100%
Seagate ST2000VN0001-1SF174 2TB
203GB free
Firmware: AN02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
64.6% Good
Read 105
Write 120
Mixed 92.8
79% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.38
4K Write 2.39
4K Mixed 0.4
146% 1.39 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 118%
WD RE4 1TB (2010)-$32
201GB free
Firmware: 01.01V02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
56.9% Above average
Read 99.7
Write 98.1
Mixed 53.4
62% 83.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.97
4K Write 2.57
4K Mixed 0.53
147% 1.35 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
52.3% Above average
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 18.4
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 12.8
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 65.5
61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 754 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $490Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback