Today's hottest deals

Asus ASUS Vivobook S 16 M5606WA_M5606WA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics58.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ASUS Vivobook S 16 M5606WA_M5606WA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M5606WA
Memory11.9 GB free of 24 GB
Display3200 x 2000 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240805
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateNov 10 '24 at 01:44
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 365
FP8LPDDR5x, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Memory 53.2
1-Core 77.4
2-Core 149
52% 93.1 Pts
4-Core 282
8-Core 487
47% 385 Pts
64-Core 1,082
67% 1,082 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 880M
Asus(1043 38C8) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 24.20.10.05
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Lighting 67.9
Reflection 38.4
Parallax 91.7
55% 66 fps
MRender 25.3
Gravity 84.8
Splatting 107
64% 72.4 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 58%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDKBA512QFM-1BD1AABGB 512GB
389GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3MA101
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,128
Write 1,098
Mixed 938
235% 1,055 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 49.7
4K Mixed 21
98% 33.4 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 333
223% 274 MB/s
Poor: 132% Great: 247%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT62F1536M32D4DS-026 4x6GB
4 of 4 slots used
24GB 23h clocked @ 7500 MHz
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
182% Outstanding
MC Read 77.6
MC Write 68.9
MC Mixed 64.8
201% 70.4 GB/s
SC Read 36.4
SC Write 46.7
SC Mixed 52.7
129% 45.3 GB/s
Latency 159
25% 159 ns
Poor: 95%
This bench: 182%
Great: 195%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 53 120 16" 1280 720 SDC4178
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback