Today's hottest deals

Packard EasyNote MH35

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 10.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPackard EasyNote MH35  (all builds)
MotherboardPACKARD EasyNote MH35
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20071105
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 24 '18 at 21:13
Run Duration79 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel T1400
uPGA 479M, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.75 GHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Memory 13.7
1-Core 20
2-Core 39.4
14% 24.4 Pts
4-Core 39.3
8-Core 38.5
5% 38.9 Pts
64-Core 38.9
2% 38.9 Pts
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 43%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545025B9A300 250GB
160GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PB2OC64G Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
34.9% Below average
Read 65.1
Write 56.5
Mixed 11.6
32% 44.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.12
4K Write 0.74
4K Mixed 0.22
43% 0.36 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DRAM
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
7.74% Terrible
MC Read 3.4
MC Write 2.4
MC Mixed 2.2
8% 2.67 GB/s
SC Read 2.3
SC Write 1.7
SC Mixed 1.8
6% 1.93 GB/s
Latency 370
11% 370 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 7.74%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback