Sony SVT11217CGW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics3.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 47% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemSony SVT11217CGW  (all builds)
MotherboardSony VAIO
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8
BIOS Date20131230
Uptime78.7 Days
Run DateFeb 06 '18 at 16:52
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 18%
CPU Throttled 47%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4610Y
N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 0.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
28.3% Poor
Memory 49.8
1-Core 15.5
2-Core 28.2
23% 31.2 Pts
4-Core 42.1
8-Core 42.7
6% 42.4 Pts
64-Core 44
3% 44 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4200 (Mobile 0.85 GHz)
Sony(104D 90BB) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 9.18.10.3215
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
3.33% Terrible
Lighting 3.67
Reflection 4.88
Parallax 4.47
3% 4.34 fps
MRender 6.81
Gravity 1.73
Splatting 5.87
4% 4.8 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 3.33%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZMTD128HAFV-000L1 128GB
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT4300Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Read 447
Write 105
Mixed 132
49% 228 MB/s
4K Read 12
4K Write 19
4K Mixed 5.97
36% 12.3 MB/s
DQ Read 12.8
DQ Write 74
DQ Mixed 5.92
16% 30.9 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
13.3% Very poor
MC Read 2.5
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 4.3
13% 4.43 GB/s
SC Read 2.3
SC Write 3.4
SC Mixed 3.5
9% 3.07 GB/s
Latency 162
25% 162 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback